Posts

Showing posts from November, 2021

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 45: Kansas City

To get Robert Altman’s Kansas City, you have to get its references to 1930s pop culture:
  • Amos ’n’ Andy (the radio show)
  • Blondie (the daily comic strip)
  • Jean Harlow (the actress)
… and, probably, various musicians I can’t identify. The movie is intercut with footage of virtuoso jazz performances, more or less in the way that Nashville has lots of country music. Only, the jazz in Kansas City is all played in the same nightclub.

The pop culture references are hardly obscure, but I’m insufficiently familiar with them. Harlow, especially, was influential; but of her movies, I’ve only seen City Lights (and I had no idea she was in it). Those who wish for a thematic overview of Kansas City had better consult Roger Ebert, who describes Jennifer Jason Leigh’s performance as a kind of jazz riff on Harlow.

The plot is fairly straightforward, although, as in other movies directed by Altman, there are several linked stories. The main story involves the kidnapping of Carolyn (Miranda Richardson), a politician’s wife, by a thief’s wife named Blondie (Leigh). Blondie’s speech, mannerisms, and appearance are copied from the movies she watches. In one amusing sequence, Blondie takes Carolyn to the cinema to view a Jean Harlow picture. Later they debate whether Harlow is “cheap” (low-class). Blondie is shocked that Carolyn should think so.

Blondie: “Her father was a dentist, Dr. Carpenter.”

Carolyn: “Dentist? Doctor? Carpenter?”

Carolyn is pretty loopy because she uses laudanum. Ebert focuses on Leigh’s performance, but I was equally taken with Richardson. She is playing one of Altman’s recurring types, a woman who makes herself seem dumber than she is.

When Blondie first enters Carolyn’s house, Carolyn is in her nightgown, with white cream all over her face. This is intercut with a flashback in which Johnny (Dermot Mulroney), Blondie’s husband, commits a robbery wearing blackface. He provokes the ire of the local Black crime boss, Seldom Seen (Harry Belafonte). Seen has Johnny captured and brought to his club. There, all night and the next day, he subjects Johnny to a lecture that is menacing, grimly humorous, and poignant, all at the same time. Meanwhile, they are serenaded by Seen’s army of jazz musicians.

Seen has a great deal to say about race relations. How well does Johnny listen? Late in the movie, he makes an appeal to Seen that is calculated to flatter; instead, it betrays that his attitude is fundamentally the same as when he put on blackface to rob one of Seen’s customers.

Seen talks and talks. He talks because he is powerful. On the other hand, several Black women in the movie say little but imply a great deal. “Nobody ever asks me,” one of them has to keep telling Blondie when Blondie tries to swear her to secrecy.

As in every Altman movie, social commentary is sprinkled in deftly, with plenty of neat little jokes and sight gags. One of Altman’s favorite techniques is to end a scene by zooming in upon a meaningful prop. And, as in Nashville, the social commentary has music to go along with it.

Samuel loved the jazz. He sat in his highchair eating his breakfast, kicking along with the music.

How the word is passed

I’ve just finished reading Clint Smith’s How the Word Is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery across America. The author travels to various historical sites – plantations, prisons, graveyards, slave markets. He goes on tours. He talks to the guides and to fellow tourists. All through the book, he repeats how important it is to immerse oneself in the history of racism in the USA and beyond.

I say “immerse oneself in,” not “study,” because the process is experiential. The guiding idea of the book is that there’s a difference between merely reading about racist oppression and (for instance) standing in cramped, dark slave quarters or sitting for a few moments in the electric chair at the Louisiana State Penitentiary.

The goal is to feel the atrocities, or, at least, to approximate the feeling.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

This isn’t to downplay the importance of also reading about the atrocities and conversing with those who witnessed or experienced them. The author welcomes these things. He practices them throughout the book.

(Of course, we, the book’s readers, are reading about another person’s experiences – the author’s – which are experiences of approaching others’ experiences. So, we are doubly removed; still, in reading, we come closer.)

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

How does the book’s guiding idea fare? How does the author’s quest turn out?

Well, in some chapters, he responds viscerally to the site he happens to be touring. These are the most stirring chapters to read.

In other chapters, while the author’s response isn’t insincere, he does have to try harder to make meaningful connections between the place, the past, and the present.

And in the trickiest passages, he considers whether he ought to distance himself emotionally from how the site is presented to him. For example, he visits a Senegalese slave port, now a UNESCO World Heritage site. It is commonly said that from this port were shipped millions of slaves (or “enslaved persons,” as the author is always careful to write). Having done his research, however, the author knows that the site was a point of departure for only tens of thousands of slaves. He asks whether this kind of discrepancy should influence the lessons we draw about the past.

He doesn’t quite answer this question, though it’s one that any serious student of history would need to grapple with.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Rightly or wrongly, “anti-racism” is sometimes categorized as a form of religious devotion. The anti-racist person – at least, the privileged anti-racist person – corrects his or her beliefs, confesses his or her sins, renounces his or her self (or former self), and pursues rectification through evangelism or through social justice work.

I can’t assess this categorization. I am no expert on the recent anti-racist movement, or on what makes a movement religious; and whatever my attitude toward racism is, it doesn’t encompass all these religious elements. But, when it comes to interpreting this book, I think religious categories can be fruitfully deployed.

For all that the book appeals to historical fact, it’s really about affective transformation.

Some transformation is an immediate response to what the senses gather in, in the way that Paul was transformed on the road to Damascus. But, the reasoning goes, lasting transformation is aided by certain (sometimes rather contrived) disciplines. Just as one might pray; serve; sing; read all of the Bible over and over again (even all of First Chronicles); observe the holidays; and take the sacraments – all because these systematic exercises change one’s heart more profoundly than merely reviewing one’s favorite passages and doctrines would do – the pious anti-racist person reads many books; talks to many people; polices his or her utterances and thoughts; recites a common liturgy; and, as in this book, goes on pilgrimages. And not only for the sake of a quick emotional payoff (though it is always tempting to reach for that). The deliberate (“intentional”) anti-racist person strives after a more comprehensive, more lasting, cumulative effect.

Read as a record of this sort of discipline, the book is interesting. Even the passages that drag or overreach serve a purpose, just as a saint’s record of spiritual doldrums and false starts would serve a purpose.

But, I must emphasize, none of this is to say whether the recent anti-racist movement really should be understood as a religion; or, if it should be so understood, whether it is a religion worth practicing. As I remarked, I am not competent to answer the first question. And whether anti-racist religion, if it is a religion, might be understood as an aspect of the Christianity I embrace, and not as an idolatrous or Manichaean rival to Christianity, is not something I can now discuss.

Midlife

As I watch the gentle, rather silly new crime drama McDonald & Dodds, several of the actors seem middle-aged; but when I look them up on IMDb, I learn they are much younger than I am.

What is more disturbing, the actor who plays Detective Sergeant Dodds – the show’s “doddering old man” – is only fifteen years older than I am.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

I didn’t intend to, but I seem to have begun a “philosophy of the stages of life” binge: not only Kieran Setiya’s Midlife, but also Susan Neiman’s Why Grow Up? Subversive Thoughts for an Infantile Age and John Martin Fischer’s & Benjamin Mitchell-Yellin’s Near-Death Experiences.

Perhaps Dante is my subconscious inspiration.

Perhaps it’s just that these books are written for a popular audience, and reading them has been an easy way to meet my daily quota of philosophy.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

I actually think the “stages of life” approach is overblown. Life is less like a journey, more like a series of Peanuts strips, in which each character plays out endless variations of a core individuality. Even the extremes of the natural lifespan – the beginning and the end – are more like waking up and going to sleep, or growing and shrinking, than like starting and ceasing to be. I was in a class in which the teacher surveyed what each philosopher thought happens when you die. What about Leibniz, someone asked. The teacher said, Leibniz thinks that when you die, you get very small. And then, of course, you grow again (Leibniz believed in resurrection). The “oscillating universe” theory of cosmology may not be fashionable these days – I wouldn’t know, I stopped paying attention after Carl Sagan – but an “oscillating self” theory seems plausible to me (until it doesn’t, until it does).

Margie; Somaliland; Western Togoland; Uyuni

R.I.P. Margie, a kindly old woman who went to church with us. She was famous for sending greeting cards. Word has it, before she died she prepared several dozen Thanksgiving cards, and so we may hear from her one last time. We attended her funeral; Samuel was asleep when we arrived, but he soon woke up and had to be taken outside; he and I sat on the front steps and identified passing cars. “Sports car. Truck. S.U.V. Sedan. Truck. S.U.V. Police car.” This kept us busy until the last hymn.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Here’s another fine video from the YouTube channel Un mundo inmenso. This one is about Somaliland, the self-governing northwestern region of Somalia.


I hadn’t known that Somaliland is so stable, or that other countries and the UN refuse to recognize it as an independent state because they’re wary of lending credibility to other secessionist movements.

(The situation may well be more complicated than this. Even so, the video is a good starting-point; also, it got me reading about another “unrepresented nation”: Western Togoland, which has eleven million people and the world’s friendliest flag.)

But Somaliland isn’t as beautiful as “Uyuni, the Most Incredible Landscape in the World”:


One time, with David, I was looking at pictures of Bolivia, and he was like, “I don’t understand why this isn’t everyone’s main interest in life.”

Chile 0, Ecuador 2

Big, big victory for Ecuador in Santiago, in the stadium of Club Deportivo Universidad Católica. We dominated in the early minutes and were rewarded with a well-taken goal by Pervis Estupiñán. Then Chile’s Arturo Vidal committed the red-card foul of his life. To the Chileans’ credit, they rallied hard and played with courage. But Ecuador created the better scoring chances – many of them squandered by Michael Estrada. It wasn’t until stoppage time that Moisés Caicedo struck the coup de grâce.


The Brazilians have qualified for the World Cup. The Argentinians have qualified. We are third, with a six-point cushion over the fourth- and fifth-placed teams, and seven points above the best teams in the disqualification zone. There’s a decent chance we’d scrape through even with four concluding defeats.

Tonight I was running my many laps, in the cold and wind and snow, and it was bleak, and I thought of quitting; but I remembered the pibes – the lads – and was inspired to push on ahead.

World Cup updates; “I love you”; Benidorm; the reader

With just five matches to play, we’re dragging ourselves over the finish line. Last month, in Colombia, we did some heroic time-wasting to earn a 0–0 draw. Kudos to our savvy goalkeeper, Alexander Domínguez, for wasting ten or fifteen minutes during his goal kicks; and to the VAR officials for annulling Colombia’s last-minute goal.

Then, a few days ago, we eked out a 1–0 home victory against cellar-dwellers Venezuela. We were so poor, the result was downright inspiring.

(In fairness, many of our regular players weren’t available.)

Tomorrow night, we’ll play in Chile. The Chileans also have been poor. Even so, they’re on a three-game winning streak and have climbed to fourth place, four points behind us.

If we so much as draw this game, our position will be very strong.

Colombia and Uruguay, the other nearest contenders, also have been struggling.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

The Troggs (on Spotify): “Wild thing, I think I love you.”

Samuel: “I love you.”

He doesn’t say it to his parents; he only repeats what he hears from the TV. When he first said “I love you,” he was repeating a sign-language lesson from Baby Einstein.

Tonight he said, “Love Benidorm.” He really does love Benidorm, the little weirdo.

I think he can read or at least recognize words he’s seen in his books. Today, he recognized the word “summer” when it appeared on the TV; and, yesterday, when the word “Texas” appeared on the TV, he said “taxi.” He’s been doing this for several months.

November’s poem

I haven’t been contagious since Wednesday or Thursday, but Samuel needs me to stay indoors with him (he’s not allowed to go out until Monday). Today, with Karin at home, I left the house for the first time since I learned I had COVID. I ran the usual number of miles, with dismaying slowness. My plan for this afternoon is to visit the library.

I am dealing with my “cabin fever” just in time to endure another bout of it. Yesterday, we had our first snow of the year. More is expected.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

W.H. Auden, “Musée des Beaux Arts” (1938):

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully along;
How, when the aged are reverently, passionately waiting
For the miraculous birth, there always must be
Children who did not specially want it to happen, skating
On a pond at the edge of the wood:
They never forgot
That even the dreadful martyrdom must run its course
Anyhow in a corner, some untidy spot
Where the dogs go on with their doggy life and the torturer’s horse
Scratches its innocent behind on a tree.

In Breughel’s Icarus, for instance: how everything turns away
Quite leisurely from the disaster; the ploughman may
Have heard the splash, the forsaken cry,
But for him it was not an important failure; the sun shone
As it had to on the white legs disappearing into the green
Water; and the expensive delicate ship that must have seen
Something amazing, a boy falling out of the sky,
Had somewhere to get to and sailed calmly on.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯


I wonder if Breugel (he had dropped the “h” from his name) painted the landscape first, and then thought, This sea looks kinda Greek; I’d better put something Greek in it. How about Icarus.

Probably not.

I practice archaeology

I’ve been sorting through books that until recently had lain in my grandparents’ shed. Ah, yes. Here is this textbook that I had been missing. And this textbook – psychology, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning – much easier to read than I remember (and even less interesting). Here’s an anthology with some good chapters. Better keep it. And here is a Daniel Clowes comic I’d been thinking of just last week. (Is it my copy or David’s? Both of our names are on the box.) What on earth is this. It’s in German. And this is in Hebrew. I’m middle-aged now. I don’t have time to learn languages.

The finding that most excites me is a short book about the Cane Ridge revival that a Bethel teacher ordered but, ultimately, didn’t assign. I’ll probably read it. Hardly my area, but that’s OK.

Why read history? Dunno, but I continue to do it. If only my approach were more systematic than, how shall I put it, channel surfing.

Samuel is delighted with the really huge, really glossy textbooks. He especially likes the psychology textbook.

Quarantining, cont.

Thursday was rough for Samuel – for all of us, really – as he came down with a fever. We called his doctor’s office and were advised to take him to the emergency room. So that’s what Karin did. (Her time of contagiousness had just ended.) I stayed at home. The emergency room doctor was pretty snippy with Karin until Samuel’s COVID test came back positive. Then the doctor’s tone changed. Samuel was x-rayed, given two doses of strong medicine, allowed to take a long nap in the hospital, and then sent home.

Friday, he again had a fever, but we soon brought it down; yesterday, he was better still.

Friday, also, I turned forty. It was odd to spend all of a birthday indoors. (I may have put a foot out on the front porch, to bring in the mail.)

I did what I like to do on my birthday, which is to subject Karin to one of my favorite movies; this year, it was Barcelona. Here is some funny trivia from the IMDb: “The plot was first suggested to director Whit Stillman when he heard of An Officer and a Gentleman (1982) and thought it referred to two different people.”

If I am not mistaken, Wednesday will be the first day that I can leave the house. Samuel will have to be quarantined several days longer.

Quarantining, 2021 edition

We have cold symptoms, but do we have COVID?

Karin took a home test and got a “yes” result. So, we both took drive-thru tests. Now we await the verdict of the lab.

Meanwhile, Karin stays home from her job.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Tonight we measured our oxygen levels. They’re normal.

Samuel has no symptoms, I’m glad to report. Or, if he does have any, he isn’t telling us.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

The results are available:

Karin, too.

So, first of all, we’re very grateful to have been vaccinated: our symptoms have been mild. And yet they’ve been noticeable enough to warn us not to spend time with other people.

And second, I worry for Samuel, who almost certainly has been infected (though, so far, he doesn’t seem to have suffered).

And I worry for the other people who’ve been around us.

I’m glad that on Sunday we didn’t go to church; but I regret that when I thought I just had a cold, I went to the store to buy medicine.