Posts

Showing posts with the label journalism

The ghost of my Christmas future

Technicians were in our house most of the day. They replaced our furnace. They thought that that would enable them to quickly fix our air conditioner. (Don’t ask me to explain how the different appliances affect each other.)

It turns out, they’ll need to replace the air conditioner, too.

That’ll happen another day.

The boys were fascinated by all this activity, especially when the technicians would open up their van to rummage among their tools. The boys would stare out through the front door, their faces pressed against its glass surface.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

I never thought I’d have so much to say about TikTok image filters, but here I go again. Today’s filter predicts how a person will look after he or she ages. It’s supposed to be pretty accurate.

A HuffPost report. Fascinating stuff.

Here’s a filtered, i.e. aged, picture of me; aged how much, I don’t know. (I’d give you the unfiltered picture, too – my present-day look – but I don’t have it. It was Karin who took the picture, and she didn’t send me the unfiltered version.)


I’m relieved not to look worse, although I’m a little saddened to see myself so … sad. Apparently, a lot of people are discouraged by how the filter makes them look.

Brittany Wong, the HuffPost “lifestyle reporter,” gives some advice on how to think about your probable future self: Accentuate the positive. Concentrate on your nice bits.

This is basically the same advice she gives for thinking about the past.

My countersuggestion is, come to terms with the promises and disappointments and ravages of time in their multitude of flattering and unflattering guises.

Tabloids

May 6, 2023: coronation day for Charles and his Queen Consort. Mark your calendars. Who knows when another coronation will occur?
Palace insiders told the Mail on Sunday that the Duke of Norfolk … had been tasked with making it a simpler, shorter and more diverse ceremony that reflects modern Britain. “The King has stripped back a lot of the coronation in recognition that the world has changed in the past 70 years,” a source told the paper.

One change reportedly being discussed is for a more relaxed dress code, with peers possibly dressed in lounge suits rather than ceremonial robes.
… the Guardian says.
The government and royal household will be conscious of the scale of the coronation in the light of the cost of living crisis facing the country.
Such backhanded compliments are often in the news. Guardian readers do not esteem the Royals. Even so, they lap up their lives and rituals like cream. Papers like the Mail aren’t the only ones beholden to the monarchy.

The Guardian is happy to quote the King when it wishes to take shots at the Prime Minister. No one expresses withering, casual contempt better than a thorough snob does. That is one of the most serviceable functions of the aristocracy. Just as civilians need soldiers to fight invaders and police to keep criminals at bay, the people need kings and dukes to show the most exquisite disdain for the politicians they elect, for their fellow human beings.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Barcelona and Inter contested a thrilling Champions League match yesterday.

Meanwhile, I was viewing a mediocre match between Rangers and Liverpool. I turned it off with less than half an hour to play. Liverpool had just gone up 3 goals to 1, and the benched Mo Salah was about to enter the game.

Much later, I found out that he scored thrice in six minutes. The match ended 7 to 1.