Posts

Showing posts with the label Thewlis (David)

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 19: DragonHeart

1996 is still an innocent time, dragon-wise. The cynicism of Game of Thrones hasn’t yet pervaded the post-Arthurian, pre-Chaucerian world of DragonHeart.


The young Prince Einon is trained by Bowen (Dennis Quaid), a “knight of the Old Code.” Bowen teaches Einon to swordfight and to do good.

Rebellious peasants kill Einon’s tyrannical father. Einon, too, is mortally wounded. But before he can die, his mother, Queen Aislinn (Julie Christie), takes him into the lair of an old worm named Draco. The dragon has the power to heal Einon. But first, Bowen, the knight, must swear an oath to bring up Einon in line with the Old Code.


After Bowen takes the oath, Draco inserts a piece of his own heart into Einon’s chest. Not only does this restore Einon to health, it makes him invulnerable.

Years pass. It’s dismaying to see King Einon (David Thewlis) grown up worse than his father, torturing, enslaving, and killing peasants.

Bowen blames the dragon’s heart for Einon’s corruption. Bitterly, he leaves the court and takes revenge against any dragon he can find.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

What follows this dark prologue is a hilarious Muppet-like romp through the British countryside. I say “Muppet-like” because its protagonist, Draco, is a benevolent monster. He isn’t a puppet – at least, not in every scene; usually, he seems computer-generated. But he’s awfully cuddly for an old lizard. Some of his expressions seem almost feline. He’s lifelike and absurd.

Best of all, he’s voiced by Sean Connery.

Draco reencounters Bowen and convinces him to become his partner in con artistry. The two lapsed adherents of the Old Code traverse the countryside, swindling peasants of their money. To do the swindle, Draco pretends to die in a manner that generates considerable slapstick humor, not unlike the false hangings in such Westerns as The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

It’s all very silly and formulaic; thankfully, the movie doesn’t aspire not to be. One particularly ripe old chestnut, served up during the opening scene, you may recall from a 1971 Wizard of Id collection:


(DragonHeart isn’t even the first movie to recycle this joke: see it done by Mel Brooks in 1981.)

A monk (Peter Postlethwaite) follows Draco and Bowen, commenting on the action like a Greek chorus.


In one scene, the monk climbs up on a large, gray rock and begins to recite obnoxiously from a scroll. Beneath his feet, a fiery eye twitches open. The rock is Draco in natural camouflage. The monk is scared out of his wits.

Later, in preparation for the obligatory battle against King Einon, the monk will become an excellent archer.

Another notable warrior is a peasant girl, Kara (Dina Meyer). Einon wishes to make her his bride. (This, too, already has been done in movies.) She’d rather kill him for his vile treatment of her father. For that matter, she’d rather kill than marry anyone. But in time she grows attracted to Bowen.


Recall that because he has a dragon’s heart in his chest, Einon is invulnerable. How this issue is resolved, I won’t tell; maybe you can guess. Also, it goes without saying that before they can defeat Einon, Bowen and Draco must remember what it is to follow the Old Code. No more may they swindle the peasants. (The movie always has been on the peasants’ side, anyway.)

Original plotting isn’t DragonHeart’s strength. That’s all right. Draco is loveable. He has a noble heart. Once he follows its promptings, the rest of his universe rights itself, too.

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 12: Restoration

This is Olivia Colman, portrayer of Anne, the last of England’s Stuart monarchs.


Anne succeeded her sister, Mary II …

… who reigned along with William III, her husband and first cousin …

… who was imported from Holland to replace James II, uncle of Mary and Anne …

… who succeeded his brother, Charles II …

… who was restored to the throne after the country’s experiment in Puritanism, succeeding his father, Charles I, who lost his head …

… having succeeded his father, James I …

… who succeeded his first-cousin-once-removed, Elizabeth I, the last of the Tudors.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Restoration takes place during the reign of the aforementioned Charles II, played by Sam Neill.


The movie’s main character is Sir Robert Merivel, played by Robert Downey Jr. …


… who resembles the diarist Samuel Pepys.


Like Pepys, Merivel witnesses the Great Fire of London, as well as a year of plague. Indeed, he is in the thick of the plague, for he is a physician.

Merivel begins as a stereotypical medical student – which is to say, as promiscuous and drunk. But he has medical talent.

One day, King Charles tasks him with curing one of the court bitches (I mean that word in its literal sense). The procedure is successful. The King invites Merivel to remain at his court.

A year later, having tired of Merivel’s boorish behavior, Charles knights him, arranges his marriage, and banishes him off to an estate in Norfolk.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Several notions of restoration come into play.

Charles’s rule has been restored to him. (It had been removed from him by the Puritans.)

Merivel also has gained a high position and lost it; it remains to be seen what, exactly, will be restored to him.

Then there are other restorations, such as of personal health, of social merriment (the Puritans who ruled before Charles were a dour lot), of professionalism, and of the soul.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

After his fall, Merivel has picaresque adventures. He keeps company with the manager of his backwater estate (Ian McKellen); with one of Charles’s mistresses (Polly Walker); with an aspiring painter (the hilarious Hugh Grant); with Quakers, among whom is his old medical mentor (David Thewlis); with a sexy Irish madwoman (Meg Ryan); and with gamblers, street folk, and plague sufferers.

Why are today’s picaresque stories invariably set in the past? Specifically, in pre-Victorian England? Is the genre not updatable?

I suppose that Restoration isn’t strictly a picaresque. Merivel does progress along a clear moral arc, as do many of the other characters. Restoration can be likened to the The Pilgrim’s Progress with its attention upon the moral journeys of various souls.

Watching it, I found myself in increasing sympathy with Merivel, with the King, and, I daresay, with the universe.

The movie depicts the period as an optimistic one. Cures were being invented. Attitudes were becoming more humane. Meanwhile, Quakers were responding to their inner light.

In one scene, Merivel and the Quakers try out a new therapy for the mentally ill. Instead of having them take their daily exercise by simply trudging around in circles, in the mud, they have them dance to music (in circles, in the mud). It’s a trite cinematic idea, but the execution is nuanced. The scene works because it shows how each character is affected.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

The movie is nice to look at. The colors are vivid. The sets are lavish.

And then there’s the joy of wig-watching. Hugh Grant’s wig, for instance:


His scenes by themselves are worth the price of a video rental.