Posts

Showing posts with the label Swift (Taylor)

Closing credits

Merry Christmas!
Rejoice, rejoice, daughter of Zion,
shout aloud, daughter of Jerusalem;
for see, your king is coming to you,
his cause won, his victory gained,
humble and mounted on an ass,
on a foal, the young of a she-ass.
He shall banish chariots from Ephraim
and war-horses from Jerusalem;
the warrior’s bow shall be banished.
He shall speak peaceably to every nation,
and his rule shall extend from sea to sea,
from the River to the ends of the earth.
Zecharaiah 9:9–10 (The New English Bible – the translation I read this year).

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Farewell, for the time being, to my step-grandma, who has gone to live with her daughter in southern Illinois; and to my grandpa (R.I.P.).

“He is not God of the dead but of the living” (Matthew 22:32).

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Welcome, Abel Barnaby, my littlest son. How celebrated he is, everywhere we take him.

Daniel and Samuel seem untroubled by him. The cats seem downright unaware of Abel, although Abel himself, so young, sounds like a cat (that’s how I distinguish him in a crowd of children).

Karin said today that she had one aim this year, which was to have this child. Abel, so-called, has been with us a short time. As “Pip,” however, he was ever-present in our talk.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Samuel has begun school spectacularly. We’ve been given to understand that he’s popular – a shock to us. His classmates look out for him. One friend follows him around and pulls his sagging pants up for him.

If Samuel is our introvert, Daniel is our good-natured scene-stealer. He’s the one with whom librarians and store clerks chat.

Winsome or taciturn, whatever you are or do, do it for the Lord.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Sports. Ecuador finished with a great victory that cast a nice glow over a frustrating year. (Indeed, this summer’s Copa América showing was rather good.)

At the club level, Moisés Caicedo and Piero Hincapié proved their worth.

Our Olympians also triumphed.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Politics. Ha!

Exercising. Ha!

Music. The song I listened to the most, by far, was “Style” by Taylor Swift: both versions: hers (re-recorded), and the original with copyright ajeno. I’d often choose “Style” as my lead housecleaning song.

I listened to almost nothing else by Taylor Swift.

Honorable mention: Dettinger.

Viewing. I subscribed to the Criterion Channel.

I’d often fall asleep viewing true crime shows on Tubi. I may write about Australian vs. Canadian crime.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Reading. I joined a club and was forced to read books I’d never choose so that I might force others to read books they’d never choose. This is salutary. Everyone needs reminding that there are other consciousnesses in the universe. “We read to know we’re not alone” (misattributed to C. S. Lewis). More like, we join book clubs to learn that, alas, one is not alone.

That said, what follows has to do with my private reading choices. I read two or more titles by these authors:
  • E. M. Forster
  • Jon Fosse
  • C. S. Lewis
  • Nancy Mitford
  • Anthony Powell
  • Peter Temple
  • J. R. R. Tolkien
  • Laura Ingalls Wilder
They’re all good authors, but whom you mightn’t’ve read but really should is Mitford. And, for linguistic virtuosity, Temple.

I’m probably the last grownup among my blood relations to have finished reading The Lord of the Rings. I made my first attempt in the fourth grade. That year, my parents bought me an extra birthday gift – a t-shirt – on the condition that I’d finish Tolkien’s series. That albatross has finally been cast off. It was necessary, first, to outgrow the shirt; to obtain the Ph.D. and sire three children; to read through the Bible several times; to read Beowulf, and the eleven Strangers and Brothers novels (for a better feel for Oxbridge). To learn to slog. It was no small victory, gaining the knowledge and courage and endurance to leave the Shire and cross Middle Earth.

Proust is on the docket for 2025, once I’ve finished Powell; after Proust, possibly Trollope or Balzac. But I doubt I’ll ever read The Silmarillion. Too few hobbits; too many elves.

February’s poem

It’s by Yeats:

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
When you are old and grey and full of sleep,
And nodding by the fire, take down this book,
And slowly read, and dream of the soft look
Your eyes had once, and of their shadows deep;

How many loved your moments of glad grace,
And loved your beauty with love false or true,
But one man loved the pilgrim soul in you,
And loved the sorrows of your changing face;

And bending down beside the glowing bars,
Murmur, a little sadly, how Love fled
And paced upon the mountains overhead
And hid his face amid a crowd of stars.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯



After the Super Bowl, Samuel wanted to listen to Taylor Swift.


Taylor: “She wears short skirts, I wear t-shirts …”

Samuel: “I wear t-shirts. And underwear.”

Yes, he does.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Karin & I spent our Valentine’s outing (yesterday) getting haircuts and eating at Hacienda. Most years, we eat in the mall food court, so this was a step up.

Wheel, Jeopardy!, and How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days played on TV in the restaurant.

I really love Karin.

Murders on Orient Expresses

Hail to the Chiefs! Great team; great Super Bowl.

I tire of seeing the same teams succeed; but I wouldn’t mind if Reid, Mahomes & Co. kept on winning. This is saying something. I’ve despised the Chiefs most of my life.

I wish Travis Kelce & Taylor Swift all the best. ❤

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Speaking again of Kenneth Branagh: Here is a lovely video contrasting his (2017) and Sidney Lumet’s (1974) versions of Murder on the Orient Express.


I haven’t seen either movie. I don’t like the novel, although I love Christie and this is one of her most acclaimed works.

Cinema – Lumet’s kind, anyway – might be the best format for this story. What distinguishes each of these briskly treated characters is physicality: wrinkles, sex appeal, vigor, accent, clothes, etc. Stuff of cinema.

Christie was a dramatist, too. That’s what those suspects-gathered-in-one-room scenes at the end of her novels really are: theatre.

Violence in Ecuador worsens

Ecuador is in an “internal state of war” after a spate of widespread, coordinated gang violence.

President Daniel Noboa has declared a sixty-day state of emergency.

The news is on Wikipedia’s main page. Whenever Ecuador is front-and-center there, I feel a twinge of pride, and then more often than not I weep (silently) because it’s because of something terrible. (Here is the Wikipedia article.)

There’s lots of official press coverage, of course.

Pray for Ecuador!

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

In other news:

“BYU Offering New Taylor Swift-Inspired Philosophy Course.”

(“Philoswiftie” website.)

Move over, Immanuel Kant.

Justin E. H. Smith’s generation

I am a Scorpio, a Rooster, INTP or INFP (depending on what day of the week I take the quiz), and who-knows-what on the Enneagram. According to current BuzzFeed wisdom, my culinary preferences reveal that the Taylor Swift lyric –
if the story is over, why am I still writing pages?
(from “Death By a Thousand Cuts” – a song I don’t know)

– will describe my love life for the next six months. (Why stop at my love life? Why stop at six months?)

More credibly, perhaps, I was born near the temporal boundary that separates the GenX-ers from the Millennials. I assume it isn’t a sharp boundary. I exhibit characteristics of both groups. Alas, I seem to have been born on the boundary’s twerpier side. I’d rather be an X-er. So it was with some keenness that I tracked down the magazine article “My Generation” by the entertaining philosopher Justin E. H. Smith.

A few paragraphs in, my heart sank. Smith was presenting an inventory of what music he used to listen to and when he used to listen to it.

(I remember when it was more or less obligatory to recite that sort of thing to people. It got tiresome.)

The tediousness of his musical examples aside, Smith’s point is that the X-ers were the last cohort to believe in “art in the fullest sense”:
What is art in the fullest sense? It is impossible to give an answer that will please everyone, but we might say that it is a distillation of the spirit of its time that somehow succeeds in breaking out above its time, speaking to us across the generations in a way that transcends the limitations of its own local idiom and its own myopic present. It is shaped by its historical period but ends up saying something quite general about human suffering, human hopes, perhaps the possibility of human redemption (or not).
(It bears emphasizing: “something quite general” is not quite something universal; I think Smith is deliberately avoiding making a claim about universality. He is interested in pitting himself against those who disavow even the more limited cases of transcendency, e.g., of art that speaks across a number of generations.)

After the X-ers, creators and audiences stopped pursuing, valuing, or even acknowledging transcendency and narrowed their focus to content shamelessly generated for like-minded people. Authenticity, as an aspiration, became a casualty. Nowadays, creators and audiences, lacking any belief in a transcendent anchor to be true to, allow themselves to be pulled along by the strongest current, and everything eventually sinks into the whirlpool of upvotes, of (Smith emphasizes) The Viral, of The Monetized.

Whether or not he’s right about the chronology, Smith does seem to have identified two strikingly opposed ways of thinking, and it does seem that the allegedly newer way (the anti-transcendence tendency) has the upper hand, Zeitgeist-wise. Or so old fogies like myself like to worry.