More trouble for the World Cup
Some dozens of recent killings in Mexico have stirred up anxiety about that country’s ability to safely co-host the World Cup.
The U.S. has safety worries, too. E.g., who will pay for the extra stadium guards and police in little Foxborough, Mass.? Not the 18,000 townspeople, who are threatening to deny FIFA the use of their locality.
Good for them.
See this New York Times article.
“We may get a little more [than usual] in meals tax and hotel tax,” a local official explains:
FIFA should give more games – or all of the games – to Canada. I’m curious what the people of, e.g., Edmonton or Regina would say. Those cities have pretty stadiums; I’ve looked at them on Wikipedia.
The U.S. has safety worries, too. E.g., who will pay for the extra stadium guards and police in little Foxborough, Mass.? Not the 18,000 townspeople, who are threatening to deny FIFA the use of their locality.
Good for them.
See this New York Times article.
“We may get a little more [than usual] in meals tax and hotel tax,” a local official explains:
But this is not a moneymaker for this town. In fact, it’s probably more of a headache than it’s worth.So it goes when a country that doesn’t really care about soccer – or about, you know, the world – is awarded World Cup hosting rights. You run up against locals who refuse to sacrifice. Which is what hosting these games is. FIFA always has made money for the rich and compensated the masses by providing an experiential high. But these particular masses don’t care about soccer or foreign visitors, so they aren’t going to get that high.
This is nothing more than seven events up there. If [the] World Cup wasn’t coming, we’d probably have seven concerts in that time. We’re not gaining much of anything by hosting this event.
FIFA should give more games – or all of the games – to Canada. I’m curious what the people of, e.g., Edmonton or Regina would say. Those cities have pretty stadiums; I’ve looked at them on Wikipedia.


