Posts

Showing posts with the label SECRETS & LIES

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 63: Secrets & lies

Is this the best movie of 1996? I think so. It has as much heart as Shine and as much cinematic virtuosity as Fargo. Secrets & Lies is a high-wire act, a controlled outpouring of uncontrolled emotion and verbiage with close-ups of tears, glares, and twitches.

When serious acting so outrageously violates the “less is more” principle, it has to be very, very skillful to come off as well as it does here.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Hortense’s adoptive parents have died. Hortense (Marianne Jean-Baptiste), a young optometrist, makes an appointment with a social worker (the great Lesley Manville, one of director Mike Leigh’s regular actors). If you want to contact your birth family, the social worker tells Hortense, consider using our agency: We’re professionals.

The social worker is full of words but also, somehow, distant. She’s an energetic bureaucrat going through the motions.

Hortense chooses to find her birth family on her own.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

One discovery surprises her. Although Hortense is black, the birth records show that her mother is white. Of course, as a matter of genetics, that’s not unheard of, and Hortense and the other characters accept it readily enough.

What shocks Hortense’s biological family is that Hortense should exist at all. The mother, Cynthia (the spectacular Brenda Blethyn), kept quiet about her first child, whom, as a teenager, she gave away without having seen.

Hortense easily finds Cynthia, who still lives in the same grubby East London house where she grew up. She’s had a hard life, working in a factory and raising a second daughter – who is white – the scowling street-sweeper Roxanne (Claire Rushbrook). Cynthia also cared for her father, now deceased, and her younger brother, the gentle, affable Maurice (Timothy Spall).

Cynthia often quarrels with Roxanne but seldom sees Maurice, who has moved with his class-anxious wife, Monica (Phyllis Logan), into a large house in a richer part of town. Maurice has “made good.” He runs a small but prosperous photography studio. He shoots weddings and portraits. He often plays peacemaker with his subjects, as he has been forced to do for Monica, Cynthia, and Roxanne.

He exudes goodness. So does Hortense. Either would make a worthy hero. Arguably, however, the hero of this story is the least reasonable person: the lonely, volatile Cynthia. She may be difficult to live with, but she has given her all.

It took many viewings for me to decide that Cynthia is the hero.

A Mike Leigh protagonist is multifaceted. He or she might seem wonderful upon one viewing and beyond-the-pale awful the next time. Or vice versa.

Who is the hero of the Book of Ruth? (God, of course; but which of the humans?)

Is it the young titular character, who bravely throws in her lot with her griefstricken second mother? Is it the hospitable Boaz?

Or is it old Naomi? She doesn’t just rest in the unexpected love of her new daughter. Instead, she sets up a proper home for Ruth by contriving – perhaps rather desperately and comically – to fully incorporate her into the family.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

As in Fargo, there’s one memorable sequence in Secrets & Lies that bears a significance that isn’t immediately obvious.

Maurice photographs a beautiful young woman in his studio. A hideous scar runs across one side of her face. She is a car crash victim. The photographs are for her insurers – she has lost her job as a beauty consultant – and also, perhaps, for use in a lawsuit. The woman is consumed by bitterness.

Someone always draws the short straw, Maurice reflects (and not for the first time).

As soon as the woman leaves, a disheveled man crosses the street and walks into the studio. He is the previous owner. Years ago, he sold the business to Maurice and moved to Australia, where he failed to establish himself. Now he has returned. He, too, is bitter.

There but for the grace of God go I, Maurice reflects.

These two characters have no influence on what happens between Hortense and her new family. Why are they in the movie? The implicit contrast is with Cynthia, who also “drew the short straw.” Like these people, she is lonely and sad and desperate. But she isn’t consumed. She’s still able to love and to be loved, and that’s what saves her and her family.

Not that they don’t have bitterness or meanness to overcome. The movie is called “secrets and lies,” after all. There is the secret of Hortense, Cynthia’s first child; and Monica and Maurice have a secret of their own.

I’m not doing justice to this rich movie.


P.S. When I first saw it, as a teenager in a Quito cinema, the color looked washed out – as in the above image. It looked washed out every time I saw the movie on VHS or DVD. Now the color is vibrant. It seems to have been touched up for the movie’s re-release through Criterion. The movie is beautiful to look at; it’s not only a balm for the soul.

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 25: Flirting with disaster

Secrets & Lies, one of my favorite movies, is a profound and stirring drama about an adopted woman’s search for her birth parents.

But this review is about Flirting with Disaster. This movie depicts a young father’s search for his birth parents.

Flirting with Disaster is neither stirring nor profound. All it aspires to be is a very funny screwball comedy. (It does make this important point: we should do right by those near to us before we search for love further afield.)

The young father is played by Ben Stiller in nervous-wreck mode. In the aptly titled Meet the Parents (2000), Stiller plays a man who disastrously meets his girlfriend’s parents. In Flirting with Disaster, his character is still disastrously meeting his own parents. This he must do several times because he’s misinformed about who his parents are.

While he searches for his birth parents, he puts on hold the task of naming his infant son. His wife (the wonderful Patricia Arquette) patiently tags along while he tries to discover his identity. But her exasperation increases as his quest becomes tied up with feelings for his adoption caseworker (Téa Leoni), a person it’d be disastrous for anyone to get involved with.

The search takes the young family – as well as the caseworker, who insists on documenting everything – from New York to California to Michigan to New Mexico. Other hangers-on join in the young family’s quest. They all arrive at the birth parents’ house for the movie’s zany climax.

Every character, except the young mother played by Arquette, has a screw loose (or two, or three). The movie slyly paces its revelations of eccentricity. A character will seem reasonable enough at first; then, he’ll let out something a little strange; and by the end, it’ll be obvious that he’s cuckoo (or at least neurotic enough to need serious help). Some of these characters achieve at least partial redemption. Others are beyond the pale. The movie dispenses its justice according to the awfulness of each character’s choices, and each choice is carefully shown to spring out from a deep well of habit.

Here’s an example. A couple of the hangers-on are staunch advocates of staying at B&Bs. This gets everyone into trouble in New Mexico. On a desolate backroad, they discover that the B&B to which they’ve been heading has been closed down because of uranium poisoning.

B&B Advocate 1, holding up his B&B guidebook: “Maybe we should have sprung for the updated edition. The picture’s right here. It was a nice B&B.”

Young Father: “Yeah, they probably have something about the uranium contamination in the new edition.”

Adoption Caseworker: “Did it ever occur to you to call first?”

B&B Advocate 2: “Without spontaneity, the world of B&Bs is fairly meaningless.”

It sounds much funnier in the movie than it looks on the page. This is a testament to the acting, as well as to the intricacy of the plotting. This movie has been made with consummate skill.


And the best news is, Secrets & Lies does everything Flirting with Disaster does – only with greater skill and subtlety. I love Flirting with Disaster. But I can’t wait to review Secrets & Lies.