Posts

Showing posts with the label Hong Kong

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 76: Comrades: Almost a love story

Compare this Hong Kong rom-com to Nora Ephron’s crowd-pleasers (When Harry Met Sally; Sleepless in Seattle; You’ve Got Mail).

Similarities:
  • The lovers “meet cute”
  • It takes years for them to end up together
  • They’re played by big stars
    • Maggie Cheung (compare: Meg Ryan)
    • Leon Lai (compare: “rom-com” Tom Hanks, with a little of Forrest Gump stirred in)
Differences:
  • The lovers are poor immigrants
  • They don’t live in apartments that only millionaires could afford
  • They don’t have respectable upper-middle-class jobs (a sample of Ephron-movie jobs: architect, journalist, CEO)
The man works for years to rise to the position of sous chef in a modest restaurant.

The woman, even more driven, holds an endless succession of jobs (hustles, really), several at a time:
  • McDonald’s cashiering
  • For-profit language school recruiting
  • Stock trading
  • Bootleg music vending
  • Tour guiding
  • Massaging
  • Being “kept” by a gangster
But this isn’t a sordid movie, at least not tonally; it really does feel like something by Ephron.

The lovers pursue and retreat from each other, stringing the audience along. There are good arguments for their coming together, and for their remaining apart. What will the lovers choose? Or will fate choose for them?

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

They become friends because they’re lonely. Both have moved to Hong Kong from the mainland. One of them knows that the other is an immigrant; the other does not. The truth is revealed only gradually.

It won’t be these characters’ last move. The story takes them from China to Hong Kong to New York: least free, freer, freest.

Hong Kong, it seems, is the intermediate stage in a “natural” progression from China to the United States, whether or not the mainlanders who stop over in Hong Kong admit it. Their behavior in Hong Kong points to it. They take English classes. They eat U.S. food and watch U.S. movies. Mickey Mouse is a recurring image. One older Chinese immigrant, who has spent her life running a brothel of Thai immigrants, is obsessed with the actor William Holden.

On the other hand, the immigrants regard the mainland as shameful. They hush up their origins. If they cling to certain relics of the past, they keep them secret.

A pop star, Teresa Teng, dominates the soundtrack. Mainlanders in Hong Kong revere but won’t openly listen to her, lest they be detected as not native to Hong Kong.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

The character who bucks the trend is Pau, a good-natured gangster played by Eric Tsang (who reminds one of Peter Lorre).

The woman involves herself with Pau during a difficult time. Pau isn’t stupid. He notices the lovers’ feelings for each other. Ruthless in business dealings, he’s surprisingly tolerant of his “kept” woman’s longings. Perhaps he can afford to put up with her equivocal feelings because, paradoxically, he isn’t a striver. He may pursue money, but he’s outside the usual hierarchy of advancement. He’ll always be riffraff; he knows what he is; he is contented.

He, too, moves to New York, and observes wryly that the rough-and-tumble neighborhood where he has ended up isn’t very different from where he began.

Meanwhile, the lovers are kept at arm’s length from each other by their mainstream notions of success.

This is my favorite image: Cheung on the left, Tsang on the right, Lai and his mainland bride in the middle. Four characters, three couples. The dream, on both continents, is for romantic and material success to issue predictably from hard work and prudent choice. But success is more capricious. The route is tortuous and unclear; at some junctures, travelers must be downright lucky.

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 49: Rumble in the Bronx

Don’t be misled by the brevity of this review: Rumble in the Bronx is as impressive as any movie from 1996. And it’s a big ball of cheese.

The dubbing is horrible.

The dialog and story are phoned-in.

The action is set in New York City … with mountains in the background. I thought the movie might have been shot in Hong Kong, but, actually, it was shot in Vancouver.

Even so …

It’s pretty good. Watching Jackie Chan is like watching Lionel Messi in his prime. Apparently, Chan broke a foot or ankle doing one of his stunts, and then he kept on making the movie with a cast on his leg.

Roger Ebert gives the movie three stars out of four, which is about right if one is comparing it with other movies by Jackie Chan. Comparing it with action movies in general, I’d give it five or six stars out of four.

Opening credits: Chan’s jetplane descends upon NYC. Dramatic sunrise (or is it a sunset?); dramatic music.


Chan has come to visit his uncle, a grocer. As they drive through Manhattan, Chan is awed. Is this where your store is, he asks. No, says his uncle. My store is in the Bronx. Cut to the Bronx, which is almost as wild as the city in Escape from L.A. It doesn’t take long before a biker gang threatens Chan.


Here is Love Interest No. 1 (Anita Mui).


Here is Love Interest No. 2 (Françoise Yip).


I must say, the movie’s attitude toward women isn’t radically forward-thinking.

There are lots of scenes with fighting and chasing, of course. In the final chasing scene, a hovercraft destroys about half of Vancouver/the Bronx (how this movie got made for just $7.5 million is beyond me). Chan uses an ancient Chinese technique to defeat the hovercraft. Chan isn’t just a great martial artist and stuntman. His character is an immensely likable human being: kind, polite, forgiving. Most harms, in the end, are healed – the main exception being the guy who gets fed into a woodchipper. (It turns out, Fargo didn’t produce the only dismemberment-by-woodchipper scene of 1996.)

Though it’s a very noisy movie, Daniel and Samuel slept through all of it.