Posts

Showing posts from March, 2021

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 37: Trees Lounge

Again I must defer to Roger Ebert, who says that this movie “is the most accurate portrait of the daily saloon drinker” that he has seen. (For Ebert’s description of his own alcoholism, see his book Life Itself, which is built from his blog entries; here is one of them.)

Steve Buscemi – who also used to drink too much – is the director and star of Trees Lounge. This is a quintessential Buscemi performance. His role in Ghost World, Ebert says, is
like the flip side of his alcoholic barfly in Trees Lounge, who also becomes entangled with a younger girl, not so fortunately.
In Ghost World, the Buscemi character is indrawn and timid; only the girl gets close to him. Tommy, his counterpart in Trees Lounge, is obnoxious, assertive, and gregarious. Everyone knows and sort of likes him.

This doesn’t make him any less sad. His drinking is inseparable from his compulsive manipulating of bartenders, friends, and women. In an especially touching scene, an ex-girlfriend watches a home video of what appears to be a Christmas gathering. Tommy is the life of the party: he exudes tenderness and fun: other revelers brim with affection for him. This is poignant because the viewer knows that Tommy has alienated most of these friends.

Despite this, the movie is a pleasure to watch because it is very funny. Tommy clowns his way through life, and a lot of the clowning is instinctively brilliant. You used to be funny, the teenaged girl (Chloë Sevigny) teases him. He’s still funny: he even knows how to ham it up when the girl’s father chases him with a baseball bat. (Come to think of it, Buscemi gets beaten up at the end of Ghost World, too.)

As one might expect, there are many closely observed supporting characters who drink in Trees Lounge. Ebert singles out Bill, an old man “whose world has grown smaller and smaller, until finally it has defined itself as the task of drinking”; he stares “blankly into space before rousing himself to use sign language to order another double shot.” Another drinker looks like a scuzzy loser but turns out to be relatively successful (he owns a delivery company). A theme is that even those who are crippled by alcoholism need not be totally dysfunctional. On the other hand, a measure of blindness seems to go with the disease. The bartender who scolds Tommy for drinking too much himself turns into a barfly when he’s not working a shift.

It’s also surprising how many women pass through the bar looking for one-night stands. The regulars who are steadiest on their feet are happy to oblige; even so, precious little consummation results from the wobbly mating dances performed in Trees Lounge. And then, afterward, the regulars are racked with guilt because they have girlfriends or wives from whom they’re only partly estranged. They idealize those girlfriends and wives, but not enough to quit drinking. The movie isn’t very interested in asking how hard it is for addicts to quit, whether it’s possible for a given person to quit (though it suggests that the prevailing attitude among the drinkers is that they could quit if they wanted to – if they had good enough reason to). The movie’s goal is simpler. It shows the costs of this sort of life – and some of the perks.

Bad hats

I bought more Madeline for Samuel – all of the stories by Ludwig Bemelmans, conveniently gathered in the omnibus Mad about Madeline, which is introduced by Anna Quindlen. (LB’s grandson also has written sequels; they are not in the omnibus.)

I believe that Samuel would prefer to just listen to the first Madeline again and again, but he did endure all of Madeline and the Bad Hat. That book is about Pepito – the Spanish Ambassador’s little son – the girls’ next-door neighbor. Pepito is a sociopath. The first Madeline is pretty tame next to Madeline and the Bad Hat.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

I am struggling to find enough time to read The Sleep of Reason, C.P. Snow’s rather long, penultimate Strangers and Brothers novel. It, too, is concerned with a couple of very Bad Hats. They commit a horrific crime.

As a courtroom procedural, the novel is not at all bad (though the crime isn’t “center-stage” until the halfway point). It even includes a stimulating Law and Order-style discussion of free will.

As soap opera, the novel is so-so. Most of the series’s recurring characters are trotted out. Two of them are especially compelling. The first is the narrator’s father, who is struggling to accept his obsolescence. The second is the narrator’s friend, George Passant: an irreverent, seedy, aging libertine who has long fashioned himself as a kind of Socrates – and who is not inaccurately thought of as a corruptor of the youth. George looms large in three earlier novels (one is even named for him). It’s in this novel, though, that he commands my fascination. Is he partly to blame for how the Bad Hats have turned out? I am disturbed by his inability to confront this question.

(Honorable mentions go to Olive Calvert and Jack Cotery, who make interesting cameos.)

Two funny songs

The boy surprised me today when I played his napping music. He hadn’t quite lost consciousness when Percy Faith’s “Malagueña” came on.

Suddenly, he sat up and laughed. He thought the guitar solo was very funny.


The next song was the theme from A Summer Place, and he thought it was even funnier. I wholeheartedly agree with him about that.

A little sunlight

Lifting Samuel, I pulled a muscle in my back. It was painful … debilitating … and so, yesterday, rather than work her half-shift, Karin stayed home to care for us.

This made for a lovely weekend, especially after Karin introduced me to the miracle of IcyHot.

Today I am mostly recovered. Karin & I did a seventy-minute stroll along the river (Samuel rode in his chariot). I’d hardly been in sunlight this year; I expect my skin to turn a little pink.

Or even a little orange, what with the meals I’ve been inventing for the rice cooker. The latest one is made of bacon, butter, whole-grain mustard, onion, and a pound of carrots. Samuel begged to taste it. I was reticent – I’d also put in cayenne powder and jalapeños – but he insisted.

What can I say? The boy likes spicy food. He did a fair amount of panting, with a wry grin.

I blink

Watching highlights of the Champions League’s first knockout round, I was surprised to see Thomas Tuchel on Chelsea’s touchline. Apparently, he’s been working there since January. Already he holds the record for consecutive victories by a manager who is beginning at the club.

(It seems like only yesterday when the previous gaffer, Frank Lampard, was scowling at those same players’ ludicrous displays.)

I also was surprised that the 6,000-seat Estadio Alfredo Di Stéfano was the venue of Real Madrid’s knockout game against Atalanta. Indeed, Real Madrid have been playing there since June of last year, and the Santiago Bernabéu is under renovation.

In other words: I’ve been ignoring world-famous clubs like Real Madrid, Chelsea, and Paris Saint-Germain (the club that employed Tuchel as recently as December, and for which he also had record-breaking success). And there’s nothing special about those giants: I’ve been ignoring soccer in general (though I do usually watch a game or two over the weekend).

This neglect is certainly due to COVID. Soccer is just not as exciting when no one is in the stands.

Which is a pity. The footballers are, if anything, less inhibited now; and the quality of play is better.

March’s poem

Kate Bush, “Wuthering Heights.”

Because it’s been a couple of years since I posted about this song.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Out on the wily, windy moors
We’d roll and fall in green
You had a temper
Like my jealousy
Too hot, too greedy
How could you leave me
When I needed to
Possess you?
I hated you
I loved you, too

Bad dreams in the night
They told me I was going to lose the fight
Leave behind my wuthering, wuthering
Wuthering Heights

Heathcliff, it’s me
I’m Cathy
I’ve come home, I’m so cold
Let me in your window

Heathcliff, it’s me
I’m Cathy
I’ve come home, I’m so cold
Let me in your window

Ooh, it gets dark, it gets lonely
On the other side from you
I pine a lot, I find the lot
Falls through
Without you
I’m coming back, Love
Cruel Heathcliff
My one dream
My only master

Too long I roam in the night
I’m coming back to his side to put it right
I’m coming home to wuthering, wuthering
Wuthering Heights

Heathcliff, it’s me
I’m Cathy
I’ve come home, I’m so cold
Let me in your window …

Ooh, let me have it
Let me grab your soul away
You know it’s me
Cathy

Heathcliff, it’s me
I’m Cathy
I’ve come home, I’m so cold
Let me in your window …

Heathcliff, it’s me
I’m Cathy
I’ve come home
I’m so cold
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

An Ithacan

I enjoyed reading this interview of the philosopher John Doris, who grew up in Ithaca, earned his B.A. at Cornell, and returned to work there not long ago (he previously worked at UC Santa Cruz and Washington University in St. Louis). I’ve known just a few Cornellians who grew up in Ithaca, but that hasn’t stopped me from forming an idea of the “native” worldview. Doris’s outlook matches it pretty neatly. Nature: yay! Science: yay! Religion: it’s OK, especially if it encourages personal decency, but it’s not really “for me.” Quasi-mystical ritual: now, this is crucial (Doris’s ritual is martial arts). Psychotherapy: crucial. Society: lots to be hopeful about (those frightening WMDs, though!). Leisure time: best spent hiking on nature trails. Or cooking.

When I lived in Ithaca, my nerves were always strung tight. Now I realize that compared to other meritocratic hubs, Cornell is an oasis of calm. And, I daresay, of goodness.

(This comes across in Doris’s interview when he compares his undergraduate years with his Ph.D. studies at the University of Michigan.)

My own early life was not so different from Doris’s. I had a lot of time to read what I wanted, in a subculture that was spatially removed from the mainstream. And I played sports and was surrounded by lovely scenery.

Mishawaka’s springtime weather has been delightful, and I can’t help but think of Quito. Yesterday, watching Samuel play with twigs on the lawn, I remembered how I used to do the same upon comfortable grass, on a campus where, eventually, I would go to school.

That place, also, was vast and quiet and walled in.

A lecture

Apparently, now that he’s done a few frolics on the grass, Samuel has learned the word “outside.” I haven’t heard him use it; but my cousin Vickie did, this afternoon, while she was looking after him.

It was the first time in months that both parents were away from him. (He did just fine.)

I was delivering one of two guest lectures in my Uncle Tim’s ethics class, on the topic of “political authority.” (Is the state a justifiable institution? What, if anything, makes it our duty to obey its laws?) It was the first college class I’d taught since 2016 – and the first philosophy class since 2013.

Will these lectures be my swan song as a teacher?

I wonder.

To prepare for today’s installment, I read well over a hundred new pages – and two or three dozen judiciously chosen old ones – and I wrote a seven-page handout for the COVID absentees. Is it unbecoming to say that, sometimes, I work pretty hard?

Samuel’s biggest adventure in a long, long time

Well, here he is out in the yard, sitting on one of the last patches of snow. (The air hasn’t been very frigid, but this patch is especially stubborn – and as hard as granite.)


Today he had a good time crawling, standing up, and falling on the soft grass. He tried to walk, but the ground was too uneven.

(Right before we took him outside, we learned that he had outgrown all of his shoes, so we put several layers of socks on his feet.)

When we came inside, he took a long nap. It’s tiring playing out in the cold.


P.S. His napping buddy is Edward Fox.

A new season

Now the temperature is in the 40s or 50s (F) – sometimes, the 60s. The snow has melted. It’s easy to see that the yard is full of trash that has blown in from the street.

Some day, when Karin is available to watch Samuel – and night hasn’t yet descended – I’ll pick up the trash.

And then we’ll take Samuel out into the yard, because he’s walking now and has never explored the yard on foot.

And I’ll kick the soccer ball with him. Which he and I have been doing inside the house, with a certain tepidness.