Posts

Showing posts from July, 2019

1996, the best year in movie history, pt. 17: The funeral

In 1995, Abel Ferrara released The Addiction, which was about a philosophy graduate student/vampire. The characters in his 1996 movie, The Funeral, also live as if they’re damned.

They’re philosophizing mobsters, not vampires. One of them, the youngest brother – Johnny, played by the skeletal Vincent Gallo – has just been killed. The family is in mourning. They’re keenly aware that death is their lot, too.

For the oldest brother, Ray – played by Christopher Walken – the event of dying is just another cinder in the lake of fire.

“I’ll roast in hell,” he says several times (and since it’s Walken saying it, it’s compelling).

He’s already roasting. It’s been that way since, as a child, he was brutally inducted into the family’s line of work.

A priest comes to Johnny’s funeral. Ray can’t stand to be near him, so he goes outside and sits in his car. It’s not that he doesn’t believe, it’s that he’s damned already. The priest goes through the motions, attending to the corpse and comforting the family, and then he summons Ray’s wife, Jean (Annabella Sciorra), for a chat. Your family goes to church, he says, but it needs to do a complete reversal of its “practical atheism” to climb out of this rut of violence.

The problem is, this isn’t an atheistic family, it’s a satanic one. One of their gangster minions is even named Ghouly, and he does a macabre dance.

Of the three brothers, it was Johnny who relished his satanic role. In flashback scenes, he dabbles in pro-union political activity – not idealistically, but out temperamental skewedness, since his own family is paid by industrialists to persecute the unions. After the funeral, Ray can’t acknowledge this fact about Johnny. Johnny was a communist, he insists. Not an anarchist. But other scenes make it clear that whatever Johnny did, he did out of perversity.

Ray rationalizes other things, too:
Ray: “All them Catholics gone insane. Everything we do depends on free choice, but at the same time, they say we need the grace of God to do what’s right. I don’t follow that, Jeany. If I do something wrong, it’s because God didn’t give me the grace to do what’s right. If this world stinks, it’s His fault. I’m only working with what I’ve been given.”

Jean: “Is that why the people they find with the bullet holes in their skulls is God’s fault? Aren’t you ashamed of yourself?”

Ray: “I’m ashamed of nothing. I didn’t make the world.”

Jean: “But you’re not doing anything to make it better.”

Ray: “Yeah, and I’ll roast in hell.”
Damnation, he reasons, is something he can’t do anything about. It isn’t his fault: it’s God’s. And since he’s damned and it isn’t his fault, he may as well keep killing.

The middle brother, Chez (Chris Penn), is the most human. He lacks the coldness of his brothers. This doesn’t make him any less brutal. In one scene, he offers to extend mercy to a prostitute. When she doesn’t respond to his liking, he punishes her, angrily, but also with a terrible logic. “You sold your soul,” he tells her.

The wives live in fear and resignation. Chez’s wife, Clara (Isabella Rossellini), prays to Agnes, the patron saint of chastity, whose killer martyred her in a frenzy of lust. Clara doesn’t pray to obtain Agnes’s help, but to remind herself that the men will always take whatever they desire.

What do the men desire, then? Relief from their constant torture? Maybe Johnny wants this. He tells a friend: “I would say life is pretty pointless, wouldn’t you, without the movies.” He is gunned down in a relatively good mood, outside a cinema.

Chez and Ray enjoy no such relief. They always suffer. Their quest is for justice, which they go around pretending to administer to others – although they know it can never console them. Because they’re damned.

One technical note. The soundtrack is superb. It consists of period jazz (the year is 1939, I believe) and also of brief, piercing strains of orchestral strings. This isn’t only a ponderous, gloomy movie. It’s also a razor-sharp one. The string music makes the scenes feel more knife-like.

More of the same

Only mundane things to report.

I was interviewed on Saturday morning for a job teaching philosophy, and my interviewers said they’d let me know the outcome by this Friday.

I’ll also have a local interview – for a job not in academia – this Wednesday morning.

A baby’s car seat arrived at the apartment today in an enormous box. It was a gift from my parents. Jasper and Ziva are very interested in the box.

Karin thinks I have sleep apnea, and I must admit I have many of the symptoms and risk factors.

Still unemployed

Little Ada is home from the hospital and in good health.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

These days, due to my online activity, I get lots of job hunting-related spam through email and Facebook.

This ad came in about five minutes ago:


Despite the caption, there’s only one generation in this photo, it seems to me.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Somewhat unexpectedly, I’ll have a Skype interview this Saturday morning. The job ad didn’t specify a salary, so I went looking in the government’s database to find out what I might expect to earn (the yearly salaries of all public employees are listed online, for transparency’s sake).

One thing led to another, and I ended up searching for lots and lots of people’s salaries. It’s taken most of the evening.

My own earnings from IUSB are online, which, previously, they weren’t. So now you can look up how much money I made last year.

“Ada is born”

– as David succinctly put it.

Indeed, she was born on Friday night, around the time I was blogging.

The child and mother (and father) are basically fine, though they aren’t permitted to leave the hospital until Tuesday.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Some of you may be wondering why the name “Ada” was chosen. I can’t remember all the reasons. But among them are these:

(1) It is spelled the same in English and Spanish.

(2) One of David’s earliest schoolteachers was named Ada.

(3) It was the name of the distinguished mathematician, Ada Lovelace.


Unlike Lord Byron’s other children, Ada Lovelace wasn’t born out of wedlock. Her mother, Lady Byron, encouraged Ada in her studies: “An education in mathematics and logic,” Wikipedia reports Lady Byron as presuming, “would counteract any possible inherited tendency towards Lord Byron’s insanity and romantic excess.”

(I doubt whether such details influenced Ana’s & David’s choice of name.)

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

“Marie” is Ada’s middle name. It’s for our mother’s mother.

Dortmund 3, Liverpool 2

“They think they’re so great,” said Karin, “but, really, they’re just wankers.”

We were at her mother’s house and within view of Notre Dame Stadium, toward which thousands of red-clad Liverpool fans were walking. They were going to cheer during the pre-season “friendly” between Liverpool and Borussia Dortmund.

Karin & I returned to our apartment.

Using the Internet, I watched the game’s second half.

Karin put up a portable baby play-yard with mesh walls that her mother had given us. Jasper and Ziva immediately tried it out.


Dortmund duly won the game.

Some say these “friendly” matches are devoid of interest. I thought this one proved at least one thing, that Dortmund is better than Liverpool when everyone is playing at a walking pace.

Stephen watched from inside the stadium. He sent me this photo of the Liverpudlian legend, Steven Gerrard.


Now that the game is over, everybody in our family is going to hunker down again to wait for Ada, Ana’s & David’s daughter, to be born.

Yesterday afternoon, the doctors told Ana & David that labor was going to be induced. But when Ana & David arrived at the hospital, they learned that many other pregnant women were ahead of them in the queue. So they went to the cinema and watched Crawl – a horror movie about alligators.

July’s poem

“Lines in Defence of the Stage”:

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Good people of high and low degree, / I pray ye all be advised by me, / And don’t believe what the clergy doth say, / That by going to the theatre you will be led astray.

No, in the theatre we see vice punished and virtue rewarded, / The villain either hanged or shot, and his career retarded; / Therefore the theatre is useful in every way, / And has no inducement to lead the people astray.

Because therein we see the end of the bad men, / Which must appall the audience – deny it who can / Which will help to retard them from going astray, / While witnessing in a theatre a moral play.

The theatre ought to be encouraged in every respect, / Because example is better than precept, / And is bound to have a greater effect / On the minds of theatre-goers in every respect.

Sometimes in theatres, guilty creatures there have been / Struck to the soul by the cunning of the scene; / By witnessing a play wherein murder is enacted, / They were proven to be murderers, they felt so distracted,

And left the theatre, they felt so much fear, / Such has been the case, so says Shakespeare. / And such is my opinion, I will venture to say, / That murderers will quake with fear on seeing murder in a play.

Hamlet discovered his father’s murderer by a play / That he composed for the purpose, without dismay, / And the king, his uncle, couldn’t endure to see that play, / And he withdrew from the scene without delay.

And by that play the murder was found out, / And clearly proven, without any doubt; / Therefore, stage representation has a greater effect / On the minds of the people than religious precept.

We see in Shakespeare’s tragedy of Othello, which is sublime, / Cassio losing his lieutenancy through drinking wine; / And, in delirium and grief, he exclaims: / “Oh, that men should put an enemy in their mouths to steal away their brains!”

A young man in London went to the theatre one night / To see the play of George Barnwell, and he got a great fright; / He saw George Barnwell murder his uncle in the play, / And he had resolved to murder his uncle, but was stricken with dismay.

But when he saw George Barnwell was to be hung / The dread of murdering his uncle tenaciously to him clung, / That he couldn’t murder and rob his uncle dear, / Because the play he saw enacted filled his heart with fear.

And, in conclusion, I will say without dismay, / Visit the theatre without delay, / Because the theatre is a school of morality, / And hasn’t the least tendency to lead to prodigality.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

(William McGonagall)

Eminent historians

Staying at home while Karin goes to work is just terrible. Oh, I have job applications and other writing projects to do. But most of the day, I’m bored out of my brain.

I’ve also been too restless to read much – from print sources, that is. Somehow, the computer screen keeps me glued to it all day.

I’ll mention a few recent readings and then be done.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

My dad linked to this article by Gregory H. Shill in the Atlantic about how U.S. law unjustly favors driving. The article is a condensed version of this much longer paper, also well worth a look.

(There was a time when I wanted to write a philosophical polemic against driving, or at least against law that encourages it, but I doubt I could improve on the work of Prof. Shill.)

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

On a totally different subject, the eminent British historian Richard J. Evans has published, in the Guardian, a savage obituary of the eminent British historian Norman Stone.

A student of Stone’s replies here, and the Spectator, while not exactly disagreeing with Evans, defends Stone here.

Long ago, Stone himself published a savage obituary of the eminent British historian E.H. Carr in the London Review of Books. Here is a quotation:
In 1961 [Carr] delivered six lectures to [his Cambridge] Faculty on the theme ‘What is History?’: it may count as his most successful book, for there is a keen appetite in schools for this boring subject, and the paperback volume is frequently reprinted. It is probably as much a mistake to ask a working historian to discuss this theme as to ask a painter to give his views on aesthetics. Carr had not much more to offer than a version of Fifties progressivism: history teaches respect for the present, or, better still, the Soviet present. In places, it read like a Marxist 1066 and All That. It does, however, begin well, perhaps even brilliantly.
I have a copy of What Is History: it has always vexed me that I don’t know what history is. I also have Evans’s In Defense of History, because I don’t know what history is for.

Stone may or may not have been right that a working historian isn’t especially able to tackle the philosophical questions. But I wonder if his own refusal to tackle them was, fundamentally, what divided him from those he criticized and who now criticize him.

Three soccer finals

On Sunday, the final matches were held for three major tournaments.

The Women’s World Cup final

I watched much of this – but not all of it (there were competing obligations of church and lunch).

The gringas appeared to be as dominant as they ever have been in history.

The Dutch weren’t bad, exactly, but their plan was too timid: they defended near their own goal and tried to counterattack with just one or two players. Their goose was cooked when they committed a ridiculous penalty foul which gave the USA the lead.

On the gringas’ second goal, the Dutch backpedaled down the middle of the field until the opposing ball carrier was close enough to shoot.

Here are scenes of the gringas partying in their locker room.

The Copa América final

This was a good, old-fashioned Southern Cone-style brawl. Don’t let Brazil’s glamorous reputation fool you. This team is basically another Uruguay – very tough on defense, organized without the ball, slick in attack at the most devastating moments.

The referee called two controversial penalties – one for each side, which I thought good – and had the guts to eject the diaper boy Gabriel Jesus.

Let me forestall misunderstanding: I like Gabriel Jesus, despite his rather sordid tastes (according to Wikipedia, he “reportedly chose to wear number 33” for his club team, Manchester City, “in tribute to the age at which Jesus Christ is believed to have been crucified,” and he and fellow diaper boy Neymar “got matching tattoos … depicting a boy overlooking a favela”). On the field, everything Gabriel Jesus does is productive – which distinguishes him from Neymar.

If Neymar had been playing, I doubt Brazil would’ve been able to control the game so well without the ball. Neymar would’ve insisted on dribbling everywhere.

Instead, he watched from the stands. (The next day, he would miss a training session for his club team, Paris Saint-Germain, triggering much speculation in the press.) He’d been left off Brazil’s roster because of an ankle injury. He’d also been accused of rape.

His replacement, Everton, won the tourney’s Golden Ball award and, in the final match, scored a goal and drew a penalty foul.

Of the Peruvians, we can say that they played well but were unable to break down the Brazilian defense.

The Gold Cup final

I only saw the highlights of this final, which appears to have been a closer contest than I expected.

Some of my friends here in South Bend are diehard USA fans. I wonder: did any of them make the trip to Soldier Field in Chicago?

If so, what was it like in that cauldron, 75% of which was occupied by fans of Mexico?

The 4th, etc.

Our son is able to distinguish light from dark. Karin shone her phone’s flashlight onto her belly, and I could feel our son kicking.

Ana & David also are expecting their first child. Her name is Ada, and she’ll be born this month.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

On the eve before July 4, Martin baked beans so that he & Mary could take them to his family’s outing on the lake.

Morning arrived. Martin’s brother called to say that the boat’s motor wouldn’t function. The outing was canceled.

“We could still go to the lakehouse,” said Martin.

“No,” said his brother, “it’s no use.”

It was rather like “An Evening on the River,” the penultimate chapter of Stuart Little, in which Stuart’s boating troubles make him so sulky that he cuts short his date with little Harriet Ames.


Martin & Mary took the baked beans to some other friends in South Bend. They ate the beans with some pasta.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Karin & I also had a disappointing Independence Day. We went to the county fair. Karin couldn’t go on the rides, of course, so our main goal was to view the livestock. But it was painfully hot and bright, and, like us, the beasts were suffering. Even the chickens were panting with tongues out.

We got ice-cream which melted in our hands before we could gulp it down (and when we tried to do so, the cold tore up our insides).

We wanted to view the monster truck show at seven o’clock. But at that hour the sun was still beaming down on us from an unsparing, cloudless, California-like sky, and we could hardly stand to remain out of doors (besides, the metal benches at the monster truck show would’ve burnt us). We cut our losses, went home, and watched The Hangover.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

The next couple of days brought torrential rain. I would’ve been glad, except that today’s rain coincided with a graduation party for the son of Karin’s boss. The party was held out of doors, in a park pavilion, with water, water, everywhere.

“You look like you’re having fun,” said the ungracious teenager.

“I am,” I told him. “Congratulations.”

He didn’t say any more to me after that.

Out of work

I’ve ceased tutoring for the summer. Now that I’ve defended my dissertation, I’m doing a month or so of job hunting before the door slams shut for getting a full-time academic job in 2019–2020.

If I don’t get a full-time academic job this month, I’ll take whatever job I can get. I need to provide for Karin and the baby.

Karin continues to go to her job. It’s a little more grueling for her each day. She’s just beginning the third trimester of the pregnancy.

Our son is about the size of a prairie dog or a Napa cabbage.

Jasper and Ziva are glad to have us back in South Bend. They were reluctant to accept us at first, but after we spent a full night at home they were very affectionate. As much as Karin & I enjoyed touring the east, we missed our kitties terribly. I hope we never stay apart from Jasper and Ziva this long again.